I received an offline note that said I was being too negative about the power of the
LLM-based technology.
I never wanted to give that impression. I am enthusiastic about that technology and its
potential.
But I am also enthusiastic about the achievements of the 70 years of AI and computer
science. The most important new developments take advantage of both. I often criticize
attempts to use LLMs for applications that they cannot support -- deductive reasoning is a
prime example.
I am most enthusiastic about the hybrids, but I am critical of attempts to make LLMs do
things that they cannot achieve by themselves. Therefore, I frequently comment on the
failures of LLM applications that do not make a proper balance. There are many, many
examples. Many of the ones I discuss were sent to me by other people -- often in offline
notes by people who would prefer not to be mentioned.
If anybody thinks that I have not achieved a proper balance in one or more notes, please
cite the examples. Some people do so on the lists and others send me offline notes.
John