Logical Graphs • Formal Development 4
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09/14/logical-graphs-formal-development…
Equational Inference —
All the initials I₁, I₂, J₁, J₂ have the form of equations.
This means the inference steps they license are reversible.
The proof annotation scheme employed below makes use of
double bars “══════” to mark this fact, though it will
often be left to the reader to decide which of the two
possible directions is the one required for applying
the indicated axiom.
The actual business of proof is a far more strategic affair than the
routine cranking of inference rules might suggest. Part of the reason
for this lies in the circumstance that the customary types of inference
rules combine the moving forward of a state of inquiry with the losing
of information along the way that doesn't appear immediately relevant,
at least, not as viewed in the local focus and short run of the proof
in question. Over the long haul, this has the pernicious side‑effect
that one is forever strategically required to reconstruct much of the
information one had strategically thought to forget at earlier stages
of proof, where “before the proof started” can be counted as an earlier
stage of the proof in view.
This is just one of the reasons it can be very instructive to study
equational inference rules of the sort our axioms have just provided.
Although equational forms of reasoning are paramount in mathematics,
they are less familiar to the student of the usual logic textbooks,
who may find a few surprises here.
Resources —
Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/03/18/survey-of-animated-logical-graphs…
Regards,
Jon
cc:
https://www.academia.edu/community/VBYW33
cc:
https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/113129787112676868