Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 27
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/17/pragmatic-truth-discussion-27/
Re: Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 26
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/16/pragmatic-truth-discussion-26/
Richard Saunders continues:
❝Agreed, but given those qualifications (the perspective on
facts qualified by the pragmatic maxim and the perspective on
correspondence qualified by irreducible triadic relations) the
pragmatic theory of truth is still a specialized correspondence
theory.❞
Dear Richard,
It is always possible to expand the coverage of any term
until it becomes vacuous, but that is not the sense in which
“correspondence theory of truth” is normally used. The usual
suspects are always dyadic relations, the “mirror of nature”,
Russell's “isomorphism theory”, and iconographies of that ilk.
Resources —
Pragmatic Maxim
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-a/
Pragmatic Theory Of Truth
•
https://oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Theory_Of_Truth
Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/02/28/survey-of-inquiry-driven-systems-…
Regards,
Jon
cc:
https://www.academia.edu/community/Lx41qn