[CG] Re: Systems of Interpretation

Cf: Systems of Interpretation • 4 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06/10/systems-of-interpretation-4-2/ Re: Mike Bergman • https://web.archive.org/web/20160410151041/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane… Re: Valentine Daniel • https://web.archive.org/web/20160328163000/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane… All, For its pertinence to the present discussion, here again is what Peirce wrote about the mathematical way of using individual or particular cases to make general hypotheses or suppositions: Mathematical Demonstration and the Doctrine of Individuals • 1 • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/05/16/mathematical-demonstration-and-th… And just so we don't forget Peirce's theory of individuals is not the run-of-the-mill absolute kind but makes the quality of individuality relative to the context of discussion — or the frame of reference as they say in physics — here is what he wrote about that: Mathematical Demonstration and the Doctrine of Individuals • 2 • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/05/16/mathematical-demonstration-and-th… Regards, Jon (https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry)