[CG] Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives”

Cf: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 8.5 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/02/20/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-c… Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 8.5 https://oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_1870_Logic_Of_Relatives_%E2%80%A2_Part_1#C… All, Earlier we took the dyadic relatives ℓ and s and multiplied them on the absolute terms 1, O, m, w. Those 8 products are now represented as products of logical matrices. (I'll post just the links to the PNGs as there are such a large number.) ℓ1 = lover of anything https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… ℓO = lover of Othello https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… ℓm = lover of a man https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… ℓw = lover of a woman https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… s1 = servant of anything https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… sO = servant of Othello https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… sm = servant of a man https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… sw = servant of a woman https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/lor-1870-othello-log… Regards, Jon