[CG] Re: Interpretive Duality in Logical Graphs

Interpretive Duality in Logical Graphs • 4 • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/04/25/interpretive-duality-in-logical-g… Re: Interpretive Duality in Logical Graphs • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/04/22/interpretive-duality-in-logical-g… • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/04/23/interpretive-duality-in-logical-g… • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/04/24/interpretive-duality-in-logical-g… All, Last time we took up Peirce's law, ((p ⇒ q) ⇒ p) ⇒ p, and saw how it might be expressed in two different ways, under the entitative and existential interpretations, respectively. The next thing to do is see how our choice of interpretation bears on the patterns of proof we might find. A sense of the possibilities may be gotten by displaying the two styles of proof in parallel columns, as shown below. Peirce's Law • Parallel Proofs • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/peirces-law-e280a… Resources — Logical Graphs • First Impressions • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/24/logical-graphs-first-impressions/ Logical Graphs • Formal Development • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/09/01/logical-graphs-formal-development… Regards, Jon cc: https://www.academia.edu/community/VjQX0k