[CG] Re: Systems of Interpretation

Systems of Interpretation • 8 • http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06/16/systems-of-interpretation-8-2/ Figure 3. Aspects of a Sign Relation • https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/aspects-of-a-sign-re… Re: Peirce List • https://web.archive.org/web/20160410151020/http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.… Re: Kirsti Määttänen • https://web.archive.org/web/20160405155000/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane… All, One of the chief advantages of Peirce's logical graphs, entitative and existential, is the way they escape the bounds of 1‑dimensional syntax and thus make it clear that many constraints of order imposed by the ordinary lines of linguistic text are not of the essence for logic but purely rhetorical accidents. That does, of course, leave open the question of what constraints imposed by the 2‑dimensional medium of Peirce's logical graphs might also be inessential to logic. As far as visualizations of sign relations go, without worrying about their use as a calculus, there is the above 3‑dimensional example from a paper Susan Awbrey and I presented at conference in 1999 and revised for publication in 2001. Resources — Logical Graphs • Introduction • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/29/logical-graphs-introduction/ Logical Graphs • Formal Development • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/09/19/logical-graphs-formal-development/ Logical Graphs • With Animated Proofs • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs Regards, Jon