[CG] Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives”

Cf: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Discussion 4 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/12/15/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-d… Re: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Proto-Graphical Syntax https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/02/12/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-p… Re: FB | Ancient Logic https://www.facebook.com/groups/204404706587604/posts/1543628845998510 ::: Henning Engebretsen https://www.facebook.com/groups/204404706587604/posts/1543628845998510/?com… <QUOTE HE:> What's your point, it's obviously too graphical, but perhaps you are driving at something else. Explain? </QUOTE> Dear Henning, I wasn't sure if your “too” was intended to mean “also graphical” or “overly graphical” but what I'm gearing up to do here is a careful survey of the source from which radiated all our most lucid graphical systems of logic, from Peirce's own entitative and existential graphs, to Spencer Brown's calculus of indications, to John Sowa's conceptual graphs. The first glimmerings of that evolution go back further than widely appreciated, to Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives” at least, and I'm hoping in time to make that clear. Resource ======== Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Overview https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/09/24/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-o… Regards, Jon