[CG] Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives”

Cf: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Selection 13 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/04/13/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-s… All, I continue with my Selections from and Comments on Peirce's 1870 Logic of Relatives, one of those works which convinced me so long ago I would need to learn a lot more mathematics before I'd have any hope of understanding what he was about. What I've put on the Web to date is linked in this Overview: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Overview https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/09/24/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-o… We continue with §3. Application of the Algebraic Signs to Logic. Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Selection 13 https://oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_1870_Logic_Of_Relatives_%E2%80%A2_Part_2#S… <QUOTE CSP:> The Sign of Involution (cont.) A servant of every man and woman will be denoted by s^(m +, w) and (s^m),(s^w) will denote a servant of every man that is a servant of every woman. So that s(m+,w) = (s^m),(s^w) https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2022/04/lor-1870-s5emw-s5ems… (Peirce, CP 3.77) </QUOTE> Regards, Jon