[CG] Re: Inquiry Driven Systems • In the Way of Inquiry

In the Way of Inquiry • Material Exigency 2 • https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/01/20/in-the-way-of-inquiry-material-ex… A turn of events so persistent must have a cause, a force of reason to explain the dynamics of its recurring moment in the history of ideas. The nub of it's not born on the sleeve of its first and last stages, where the initial explosion and the final collapse march along their stubborn course in lockstep fashion, but is embodied more naturally in the middle of the above narrative. Experience exposes and explodes expectations. How can experiences impact expectations unless the two types of entities are both reflected in one medium, for instance and perhaps without loss of generality, in the form of representation constituting the domain of signs? However complex its world may be, internal or external to itself or on the boundaries of its being, a finite creature's description of it rests in a finite number of finite terms or a finite sketch of finite lines. Finite terms and lines are signs. What they indicate need not be finite but what they are, must be. Fragments — The common sensorium. The common sense and the senses of “common”. This is the point where the empirical and the rational meet. I describe as “empirical” any method which exposes theoretical descriptions of an object to further experience with that object. Overview • https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Overview Obstacles • https://oeis.org/wiki/Inquiry_Driven_Systems_%E2%80%A2_Part_5#Obstacles Regards, Jon cc: https://www.academia.edu/community/L6q1rV cc: https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/111711093052443586