[CG] Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives”

Cf: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 3 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/02/03/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-co… Re: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 10.6 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/04/16/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-c… Re: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 10.7 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/04/18/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-c… Figure 21. Composite of Triadic G on Dyadic L https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/lor-1870-composite-o… All, In passing to more complex combinations of relative terms and the objective relations they denote, as we began to do in Comments 10.6 and 10.7, I made use of words like “composite” and “composition” along with the usual composition sign “◦” to describe their structures. That amounts to loose speech on my part and I may have to reform my Sprach at a later stage of the Spiel. At any rate, we need to distinguish the more complex forms of combination encountered here from the ordinary composition of dyadic relations symbolized by “◦” whose result must stay within the class of dyadic relations. We can draw that distinction by means of an adjective or a substantive term — so long as we see it we can parse the words later. Resources ========= Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Overview https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/09/24/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-o… Regards, Jon