Cf: Higher Order Sign Relations • 5
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/08/09/higher-order-sign-relations-5/
Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • 4
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/08/06/higher-order-sign-relations-4/
Re: Conceptual Graphs • Gary Zhu
<QUOTE GZ:>
Is there any good contemporary reading of Peirce & James that you recommend?
Their original works have been quite challenging for me.
Dear Gary,
(I wrote that last message on my phone while watching tv ...
I'll try to remember not to do that again ... not only
did I fail to give James his due but it looks like the'
formatting got messed over on the copy I got back.
Here's a better version I hope ...)
As fortune would have it, I haven't found much to recommend in the secondary
literature on Peirce over the last couple
of decades. Most of it looks bent on assimilating Peirce to the conventional wits of
analytic and continental
philosophy. As a result, I hew pretty close to Peirce himself in my current reading. You
could try the two volumes of
the Essential Peirce for general orientation, if a trifle light on the math side of
Peirce.
The last contemporary work I read with anything like the spirit of Peirce about it would
probably be Sowa's Conceptual
Structures, so try that if you haven't already. Still worth reading are Pragmatism by
William James and How We Think by
John Dewey. James and Dewey lacked the mathematical perspective needed to take in
Peirce's full scope and Dewey was a
little slow getting up to speed with Peirce's message but he kept at it and had the
benefit of living long enough to
become an able expositor of pragmatic and scientific ways. Plus he understood people and
society far better than Peirce
ever did.
There are a few references at the end of the following paper.
• Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”,
Inquiry : Critical Thinking
Across the Disciplines 15(1), 40–52. Archive (
https://web.archive.org/web/20001210162300/http://chss.montclair.edu/inquir…
) . Journal (
https://www.pdcnet.org/inquiryct/content/inquiryct_1995_0015_0001_0040_0052 ) . Online
(doc) (
https://www.academia.edu/1266493/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inqui… ) (pdf) (
https://www.academia.edu/57812482/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inqu… ) .
Regards,
Jon