Theme One Program • Motivation 2
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/06/04/theme-one-program-motivation-2-b/
All,
A side‑effect of working on the Theme One program over the
course of a decade was the measure of insight it gave me into
the reasons why empiricists and rationalists have so much trouble
understanding each other, even when those two styles of thinking
inhabit the very same soul.
The way it came about was this. The code from which the program is
currently assembled initially came from two distinct programs, ones
I developed in alternate years, at first only during the summers.
In the “Learner” program I sought to implement a Humean empiricist
style of learning algorithm for the adaptive uptake of coded sequences
of occurrences in the environment, say, as codified in a formal language.
I knew all the theorems from formal language theory telling how limited
any such strategy must ultimately be in terms of its generative capacity,
but I wanted to explore the boundaries of that capacity in concrete
computational terms.
In the “Modeler” program I aimed to implement a variant of Peirce's
graphical syntax for propositional logic, making use of graph‑theoretic
extensions I had developed over the previous decade.
As I mentioned, work on those two projects proceeded in a parallel series
of fits and starts through interwoven summers for a number of years, until
one day it dawned on me how the “Learner”, one of whose aliases was “Index”,
could be put to work helping with sundry substitution tasks the “Modeler”
needed to carry out.
So I began integrating the functions of the “Learner” and the “Modeler”,
at first still working on the two component modules in an alternating
manner, but devoting a portion of effort to amalgamating their principal
data structures, bringing them into convergence with each other, and
unifying them over a common basis.
Another round of seasons and many changes of mind and programming
style, I arrived at a unified graph‑theoretic data structure, strung
like a wire through the far‑flung pearls of my programmed wit. But the
pearls I polished in alternate years maintained their shine along axes
of polarization whose grains remained skew in regard to each other.
To put it more plainly, the strategies I imagined were the smartest tricks
to pull from the standpoint of optimizing the program’s performance on the
“Learning” task I found the next year were the dumbest moves to pull from
the standpoint of its performance on the “Reasoning” task. I gradually
came to appreciate that trade‑off as a “discovery”.
Resources —
Theme One Program • Overview
•
https://oeis.org/wiki/Theme_One_Program_%E2%80%A2_Overview
Theme One Program • Exposition
•
https://oeis.org/wiki/Theme_One_Program_%E2%80%A2_Exposition
Theme One Program • User Guide
•
https://www.academia.edu/5211369/Theme_One_Program_User_Guide
Survey of Theme One Program
•
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/02/26/survey-of-theme-one-program-6/
Regards,
Jon
cc:
https://www.academia.edu/community/VodZxj
cc:
https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/112554698776574635