[CG] Re: Laws of form

Edwina, The work of Charles Sanders Pierce is very interesting, but he never discovered the "imaginary" values of a complete logical system. I am sure that had he been given a copy of Laws of Form, his reaction would have been the same as Bertrand Russell's, "This is the book I wish I had written." If your focus on Pierce is based on his introduction of new terminology to describe things, semiotics, and such, then I sincerely invite you to read Illobrand von Ludwiger's monogram on "The New Worldview of the Physicist Burkhard Heim." Heim introduced a lot of new terms because he was describing things no one had thought of before. If you want to skip the physics and go to the heart of the matter, then start with page 81, "The aspect-related Logic for the unified Description of Body and Soul." http://heim-theory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/I-v-Ludwiger-The-New-Worl… Here is a sample of what you will find there: "The interpretation of the two additional dimensions in Heim’s theory as coordinates with qualitative character demanded the alternative logic being expanded to an aspect-related logic. With his logical method independent of a specific statement system Heim was then able to make quantitative and qualitative statements in a unified formal way. This method is called syntrometry by Heim. It is the combination of different metronic structures. "The consequence is, we no longer need to try deriving life processes or consciousness from physical quantum processes, but you start from a superior entity that manifests itself in this logic method, the syntrometry." What I am working on now is to demonstrate how Heim's "different metronic structures" are specific Forms that were Indicated by the Creator for this specific Universe. Best regards, Lyle