[CG] Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic of Relatives”

Cf: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 11.6 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/05/04/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-c… Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 11.6 https://oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_1870_Logic_Of_Relatives_%E2%80%A2_Part_2#C… All, Let’s continue working our way through the above definitions, constructing appropriate examples as we go. 1. Relation E₁ ⊆ X × Y exemplifies the quality of “totality at X”. •• https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/lor-1870-figure-31.j… 2. Relation E₂ ⊆ X × Y exemplifies the quality of “totality at Y”. •• https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/lor-1870-figure-32.j… 3. Relation E₃ ⊆ X × Y exemplifies the quality of “tubularity at X”. •• https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/lor-1870-figure-33.j… 4. Relation E₄ ⊆ X × Y exemplifies the quality of “tubularity at Y”. •• https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/lor-1870-figure-34.j… So E₃ is a pre-function e₃ : X ⇀ Y and E₄ is a pre-function e₄ : X ↼ Y. Resources ========= Logic Syllabus https://oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus Relational Concepts https://oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus#Relational_concepts Relation Theory https://oeis.org/wiki/Relation_theory Relative Term, Rhema, Rheme https://oeis.org/wiki/Relative_term Regards, Jon