[CG] Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 9 • http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/19/inquiry-into-inquiry-discussion-9/ Re: Milo Gardner • https://www.academia.edu/community/VBqzR5?c=Q4jJVy MG: ❝Do you agree that Peirce was limited to bivalent logic?❞ My Comment — Taking classical logic as a basis for reasoning is no more limiting than taking Dedekind cuts as a basis for constructing the real number line. For Peirce's relational approach to logic as semiotics the number of dimensions in a relation is more important than the number of values in each dimension. That is where 3 makes a difference over 2. Regards, Jon cc: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey cc: https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/110299510074465249