lists.cs.uni-kassel.de
Sign In
Sign Up
Sign In
Sign Up
Manage this list
×
Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j
: Next unread message
k
: Previous unread message
j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
2024
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2023
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2022
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2021
December
November
October
List overview
Download
CG
February 2024
----- 2024 -----
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
----- 2023 -----
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
----- 2022 -----
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
----- 2021 -----
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
cg@lists.iccs-conference.org
7 participants
21 discussions
Start a n
N
ew thread
Interpreter and Interpretant
by Jon Awbrey
Interpreter and Interpretant • Selection 1 •
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/01/27/interpreter-and-interpretant-selec…
All, Questions about the relation between “interpreters” and “interpretants” in Peircean semiotics have broken out again. To put the matter as pointedly as possible, because I know someone or other is bound to — In a theory of three‑place relations among objects, signs, and interpretant signs, where indeed is there any place for the interpretive agent? By way of getting my feet on the ground with the issue I'll do what always helped me before and review a small set of basic texts. Here is the first. Figure 1. The Sign Relation in Aristotle •
https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2022/04/awbrey-awbrey-1995-e…
❝Words spoken are symbols or signs (symbola) of affections or impressions (pathemata) of the soul (psyche); written words are the signs of words spoken. As writing, so also is speech not the same for all races of men. But the mental affections themselves, of which these words are primarily signs (semeia), are the same for the whole of mankind, as are also the objects (pragmata) of which those affections are representations or likenesses, images, copies (homoiomata).❞ (De Interp. i. 16a4). References — Aristotle, “On Interpretation” (De Interp.), Harold P. Cooke (trans.), pp. 111–179 in Aristotle, Volume 1, Loeb Classical Library, William Heinemann, London, UK, 1938. Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15(1), 40–52. •
https://web.archive.org/web/20001210162300/http://chss.montclair.edu/inquir…
•
https://www.pdcnet.org/inquiryct/content/inquiryct_1995_0015_0001_0040_0052
•
https://www.academia.edu/1266493/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inqui…
•
https://www.academia.edu/57812482/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inqu…
Regards, Jon cc:
https://www.academia.edu/community/5wYa3L
cc:
https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/111829392534115897
9 months, 2 weeks
3
5
0
0
← Newer
1
2
3
Older →
Jump to page:
1
2
3
Results per page:
10
25
50
100
200