John,
 
It is a pity indeed that he passed away, he was a scientist of the constructive type.
Since I always saw a similarity in your and Ronalds approach in how you deal with Peirce maybe it is a good time ta ask your opinion about this.
 
Both of you differ from the main sentiment on peirce-list, which concentrates on interpretations on what peirce might have ment. So the theoretical fight is about the right interpretation of the masters writings. Concentration on the signs in itself, seems an adequate label.
 
Alternatively, the both of you use Peirce in order to contribute to his goal with semiotics, which is to understand interpretation processes as sign processes. But, the perspectives differ offering different views on the processes.
 
In my opinion you concentrate on the semantic dimension, while Ronald had a keen eye for the pragmatic dimension, the pragmmatic and social layers of his ladder. This shows in his ontology charts in which always society is the most remote root node. Thus it becomes possible to adress the problem of differing knowledge systems in any actual situation, hence also Ronalds heavy interest in 'responsible behavior'.  
 
I am curious after your view on the relation between your graphs and Stampers charts.
 
Best,
 
Auke van Breemen
 
PS. In https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-94541-5_10 I elaborate on Stampers take.
 
 
 
 
Op 19-07-2024 23:47 CEST schreef John F Sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>:
 
 
Simon,
 
I'm sorry to hear that Stamper had died.  I had regarded his work over the years as quite respectable. 
 
Most readers are unlikely to click on titles with URLs.   But if you include an interesting quotation (one or two paragraphs), they are more likely to click.  Perhaps you could elaborate on your note below.
 
John
 
 
From: "Polovina, Simon (BTE)' via ontolog-forum" <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>

Hi all.

John, thank you for interrelating the multiple semantics and ontology projects in https://jfsowa.com/ikl, a handy resource!

Regarding the article forwarded by Alex, Stamper’s Semiotic ladder would be pertinent:tp://assets.cs.ncl.ac.uk/seminars/101.pdf (and multiple subsequent materials on the subject: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=stampers+semiotic+ladder)

I’ve referred to it in my past work, e.g.:

I believe that the late Stamper’s work is underrepresented, but it would be interesting to hear your thoughts.

Thanks!

Simon

 

_______________________________________________
CG mailing list -- cg@lists.iccs-conference.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cg-leave@lists.iccs-conference.org